History tells us that the Christian church, by upholding certain ‘beliefs’, have been the instrument of oppression of certain people and groups. Until enlightenment came Christians did not see what they were doing as oppression as they believed (based on the current worldview) that they were upholding God’s word. Unchangeable traits such as race, gender and currently sexual orientation, have been the criteria for treating others like second-class citizens. By not treating others as equals, a hierarchy is created that can never liberate only oppress.
Initially, when the church was birthed, Jewish males were at the top of the hierarchy, with Gentiles, women and others seen as being lesser in value. From what I can see, if God is trying to do anything in this world, He is trying to get through our thick skulls that all people are of equal value and worth and should be treated with dignity and respect. That kind of theology will create a better world for us all.
History has a sober warning to us all when we feel so convinced we are defending the ‘truth’.
The statement ‘the bible says homosexuality is a sin’ is not unlike other ‘truths’ the Christian Church has upheld over the centuries.
1. Once Heresy now Truth —The world revolves around the sun
The churches previous position — The earth is the centre of the universe
Four centuries ago church leaders refused to believe scientists such as Copernicus and Galileo, who said that the world revolved around the sun. The current worldview, based on several verses, including Joshua 10:13 where Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, implied that the earth was already standing still and therefore the sun moved. Galileo was placed under house arrest in 1633 as a heretic for stating a scientific fact that was in opposition to what the church leaders taught. Eventually the scientific evidence could no longer be denied but it wasn’t till 1992 that Pope John Paul II expressed regret for how the Galileo affair was handled—that’s an embarrassingly long time to wait for an apology.
The Catholic leaders were not the only ones to see the scientists as heretics. Martin Luther said, ‘This fool Copernicus wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred Scripture in Joshua 10:13 tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth.’ John Calvin quoted Psalm 93 in his attack on Copernicus. ‘The earth also is established. It cannot be moved.’ Calvin added, ‘Who will venture to place the authority of Copernicus above that of the Holy Spirit?’ To all Protestants these men are the founders of their faith but today we must acknowledge that their ‘biblical’ beliefs were in error. Or it would be better to say their interpretations were in error. The worldview was based on limited understanding which created wrong interpretation.
2. Once Heresy now Truth —White and black are equal
The churches previous position —White is superior, black is inferior
At the start of the 19th century, most religious groups believed that human slavery was totally acceptable based on a biblical mindset. Black people where considered to be morally and intellectually inferior to whites and it was the Christian landowners’ God-given service to humankind to keep them in check. According to the biblical understanding of the day black people had inherited the ‘curse of Ham’ (black skin to mark the cursed race) because Ham saw his father Noah lying naked after he’d passed out from too much wine. It seems quite bizarre that the drunken Noah should curse his son and black skinned people from that time because he didn’t know how to hold his liquor.
There are passages in the Old and New Testaments that approve and regulate the ownership of human slaves. It’s interesting to note that for nineteen centuries people focused on those verses and somehow missed the fundamental biblical themes of love, mercy, justice, and equality. In a more enlightened world today, when Christians read those passages on slavery, they consider it an injustice that belonged to another time and culture. A remnant remains like white supremacist organisations such as the Klu Klux Klan whose existence is justified by an outdated interpretation of the scriptures.
In Australia, approximately 100,000 Indigenous children (the stolen generation) were removed from their families by Australian government agencies and church missions between around 1900 and 1969. Originally this was carried out in the name of child welfare but resulted in extensive family and cultural damage. A well-intentioned ‘Christian’ nation created this policy believing indigenous Australians to be inferior and that they should be bred out. Today we think of this as an horrific injustice and violation of human rights. Indigenous and other Australians are still waiting for our church-going, Christian Prime Minister, on behalf of our nation to say one word that could begin healing—sorry. (A new Prime Minster changed this)
3. Once Heresy now Truth — Two people who love each other should marry no matter what colour their skin
The churches previous position — God separated the races therefore they should never marry
The last states in the US to remove the law that banned interracial marriage were in the ‘bible belt’ (the area in which conservative Christian Evangelical Protestantism is a pervasive or dominant part of the culture). As late as 1959, a couple from Virginia, the bride black, her husband white, were sentenced to one year’s gaol for getting married. In a land settled by the pilgrims that boldly proclaimed ‘liberty and justice for all’, the law stated: ‘Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with His arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages.’ In 1967 the US Supreme Court, against opposition from Virginia and North Carolina (both ‘bible belt’ states), unanimously ruled the inter-racial marriage restrictions unconstitutional. The freedom to marry, the court said, was a basic human right. It’s hard to imagine today legislation like that even existed in a civilised society but similar laws were in existence in Australia till 1967. Finally when two people of different races fell in love they were allowed to marry. The oppressed were set free.
4. Once Heresy now Truth —Men and women are of equal value and worth
The churches previous position — men are superior, women are inferior
Up until the middle of the 19th century, most Christians had a pretty clear understanding of the role of women. It was all there in the bible. To be a good Christian woman you had to dress and behave in a certain way, your chief roles being that of keeping house, raising children, and submitting to the will of your husband. Being given such basic privileges as the right to vote, hold office, preach or pastor a church – God forbid, that was men’s work and too much responsibility for the less intelligent, weaker female sex. Again, there were specific passages in the Bible that justified this kind of inequality and oppression. Whilst some denominations still treat women as second-class citizens, most have realised ‘hey what’s the issue?’ and embrace their contribution on every level.
5. Once Heresy now Truth — same sex orientation, for a percentage of the population, is a normal expression of sexuality and occurs in all of creation
The churches previous but changing position— the Bible says homosexuality is a sin
The statement ‘the Bible says homosexuality is a sin’ is actually a false statement. It’s impossible for homosexuality to be a sin. We know from science today that homosexuality is a sexual orientation like heterosexuality and therefore it’s amoral. As I find myself saying repeatedly to people who have been taught to believe the equation that homosexuality = promiscuity—‘my morality is a choice, my sexual orientation, however, isn’t’.
Many are surprised to find there is no chapter or verse for that quote we hear so often ‘the Bible says homosexuality is a sin’ in either the Old or New Testaments; it is a belief or assumption based on an interpretation of several verses—six passages out of 31,240 verses.
Hi Tony, thanks for this, I’ve read it and believe what you say about
homosexuality = promiscuity—‘my morality is a choice, my sexual orientation, however, isn’t’.
I think therein lies a key because God does speak about immorality.
Love to you
Meg Sbrocchi
thanks Meg….nice to hear from you….it took me a long time to sort out the difference between the two myself. The Assemblies of God in Australia have acknowledge the difference as well.
http://www.aog.org.au/Media/MediaReleases/tabid/146/Default.aspx#2006-03-07
“However, we need to distinguish between a person’s identity and activity. There is a great deal of difference between a homosexual preference and homosexual practice. It is the latter that is the issue here. People may argue about how easy it is to choose or change our sexual preference but we can definitely choose our sexual behaviour.”
We should never assume that just because someone is same sex oriented that it automatically makes them immoral or promiscuous any more than we should if someone is heterosexual.
Hi Anthony,
Thanks for the effort in putting together this article. As you are aware, I came to Australia from South Africa. One of the four pillars of apartheid was the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, Act No 55 of 1949. This was fully supported and unambiguously entrenched by the major Afrikaans Church, the NGK (Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk ) or the Dutch Reformed Church of South Africa. Interracial marriages were simply prohibited. This highly bigoted way of viewing the world by the NGK also ensured that any behavior not sanctioned by this ultra conservative and dominant order, was both illegal and was grounds for imprisonment. This included homosexual behavior.
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act was only scrapped in 1985 as part of the slow dismantling of apartheid under the last white President as the country transitioned towards full democracy in 1994. The churches had no option but to change their views on interracial marriage as their opposition to it now became illegal and they suddenly embraced and supported the idea – hypocrisy indeed! I lived next door to a NGK minister at the time and witnessed the agony he went through as his prejudices were being challenged.
It was also at that time that the new Constitution was born which specifically prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. An extract states: “The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.”
The flowing also appeared in a recent press article in South Africa:
“South Africa is the only country in the world where the Constitution specifically prohibits discrimination against sexual minorities. An organised opposition to same-sex marriages in South Africa is very weak, and mainly composed of conservative minority church groups. South Africans at large, however, are sceptical to homosexuality, recent surveys have shown.”
Attitudes change slowly, but at least the courts are there to support!
thanks for the additional insights Nigel……its a common struggle around the world isn’t it….to overcome years of ignorance which has lead to all types of bigotry , discrimination and prejudice.
Thank you so much. I couldn’t agree more.
thanks Crystal. How did you find my site
Thank You Anthony for your great service to this world. I been fallowing your work since I first listen to A Life for Unlearning audiobook like a year ago, And all I can say is that you are a great inspiration and I admire you so much for all this information and educational material you share with us, since I Understand how hard living discrimination is. I wish someday I can do something as powerful and significant for others as you do. Im sure your work is saving people´s lives and transforming this world and making it a better place to live. And for that Im very grateful, thankyou Anthony.